2009 Ford Explorer vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Ford Explorer is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1188 kg more than 2009 Ford Explorer.
Because 2009 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Explorer | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Explorer | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4009 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 107 L |