2009 Ford Explorer vs. 2004 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Ford Explorer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 198 kg more than 2009 Ford Explorer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Explorer | 2004 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Explorer | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 292 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
