2009 Ford Explorer vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix

To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford Explorer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford Explorer would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Explorer (207 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (158 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.

Because 2009 Ford Explorer is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Explorer. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Explorer (254 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Explorer 2011 Toyota Matrix
Make Ford Toyota
Model Explorer Matrix
Year Released 2009 2011
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4009 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 207 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 254 Nm 219 Nm
Torque RPM 3700 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1765 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1549 mm
Wheelbase Size 3320 mm 2601 mm
Fuel Consumption City 16.8 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 85 L 50 L