2009 Ford F-150 vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2009 Ford F-150 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-150 (245 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 1949 Hudson Commodore has manual transmission. 1949 Hudson Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-150 | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Hudson |
| Model | F-150 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 245 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3160 mm |
