2009 Ford F-150 vs. 1996 Holden XU 6
To start off, 2009 Ford F-150 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Holden XU 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Holden XU 6 would be higher.
Because 2009 Ford F-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Holden XU 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Holden XU 6 (515 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford F-150. (400 Nm). This means 1996 Holden XU 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford F-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-150 | 1996 Holden XU 6 | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | F-150 | XU 6 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 248 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 515 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
