2009 Ford F-150 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 Ford F-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-150 (248 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1359 kg more than 2009 Ford F-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-150 (400 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-150 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | F-150 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 248 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3510 mm |