2009 Ford F-150 vs. 2002 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Ford F-150 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 204 kg more than 2009 Ford F-150.
Because 2002 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford F-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-150 | 2002 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-150 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5408 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 311 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |