2009 Ford F-150 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford F-150 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 514 kg more than 2009 Ford F-150.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-150 (495 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman. 2009 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Countryman has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Countryman will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-150 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | F-150 | Countryman |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 281 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5590 mm | 4133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1940 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3370 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 13.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 47 L |