2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1954 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1954 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1954 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-250 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1954 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-250 | 1954 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | F-250 | Minx |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5399 cc | 1265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2370 mm |
