2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1962 Mazda R 360
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Mazda R 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Mazda R 360 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1962 Mazda R 360. (16 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1962 Mazda R 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-250 weights approximately 586 kg more than 1962 Mazda R 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 473 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Mazda R 360. (22 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Mazda R 360.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 1962 Mazda R 360 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-250 | R 360 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 355 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 16 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 22 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 2990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 1770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 144 L | 55 L |