2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. (212 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Pontiac Tempest. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 384 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Ford | Pontiac |
Model | F-250 | Tempest |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5399 cc | 5341 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2930 mm |