2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 234 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | F-250 | HD |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5399 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 237 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2700 mm |