2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1967 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-250 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Bluebird. (103 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 1967 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-250 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5399 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 906 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2430 mm |