2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1974 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1974 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1974 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1974 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 279 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 1974 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | F-250 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2700 mm |