2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 24 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-250 | 1977 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F-250 | Celeste |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5399 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2350 mm |
