2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1982 Mazda 121
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mazda 121 weights approximately 144 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 1982 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-250 | 121 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5770 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2520 mm |