2009 Ford F-250 vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP) has 233 more horse power than 1997 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Because 2009 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F-250 | Midge |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5399 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1400 mm |