2009 Ford F-250 vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki F1 would be higher. At 5,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 504 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm) has 389 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford F-250 has manual transmission. 2009 Ford F-250 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | F-250 | F1 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5399 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 115 L | 45 L |