2009 Ford F-250 vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Saab 9000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Saab 9000 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (115 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 619 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Because 2009 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-250 | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | F-250 | 9000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 2288 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1585 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 144 L | 61 L |