2009 Ford F-350 vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 269 kg more than 2009 Ford F-350.
Because 2009 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-350 | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Ford | Riley |
| Model | F-350 | RM A |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2870 mm |
