2009 Ford F-350 vs. 1962 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 4 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-350 weights approximately 426 kg more than 1962 Renault 4.
Because 2009 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-350 | 1962 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | F-350 | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5400 cc | 603 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 546 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6260 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 115 L | 34 L |
