2009 Ford F-350 vs. 1963 Rover 2000

To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-350 (301 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rover 2000 weights approximately 246 kg more than 2009 Ford F-350.

Because 2009 Ford F-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford F-350 1963 Rover 2000
Make Ford Rover
Model F-350 2000
Year Released 2009 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5400 cc 1978 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 301 HP 91 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 495 Nm 150 Nm
Torque RPM 3750 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.0:1
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 6 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 966 kg 1212 kg
Vehicle Length 5890 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 2050 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 3610 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 115 L 54 L