2009 Ford F-350 vs. 1963 ZAZ Jalta
To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 ZAZ Jalta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 ZAZ Jalta would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-350 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 ZAZ Jalta. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 ZAZ Jalta.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-350 | 1963 ZAZ Jalta | |
Make | Ford | ZAZ |
Model | F-350 | Jalta |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 636 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6260 mm | 3340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2030 mm |