2009 Ford F-350 vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1965 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1965 Lincoln Continental. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1440 kg more than 2009 Ford F-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-350 | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | F-350 | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5398 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 2406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 115 L | 90 L |