2009 Ford F-350 vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 5,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-350 (300 HP) has 240 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2009 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-350 (495 Nm) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2009 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-350 | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-350 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5398 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 495 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5890 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3610 mm | 2440 mm |