2009 Ford F-350 vs. 1995 Nissan CQ-X
To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan CQ-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan CQ-X would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford F-350 weights approximately 114 kg more than 1995 Nissan CQ-X.
Because 2009 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan CQ-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1995 Nissan CQ-X has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford F-350 has manual transmission. 2009 Ford F-350 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Nissan CQ-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-350 | 1995 Nissan CQ-X | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | F-350 | CQ-X |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 852 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3490 mm | 2530 mm |