2009 Ford F-350 vs. 2002 Jaguar X400
To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar X400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar X400 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar X400 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Ford F-350. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar X400 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford F-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar X400 weights approximately 828 kg more than 2009 Ford F-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar X400 (525 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford F-350. (495 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar X400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford F-350. 2002 Jaguar X400 has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford F-350 has manual transmission. 2009 Ford F-350 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar X400 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-350 | 2002 Jaguar X400 | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | F-350 | X400 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5400 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 495 Nm | 525 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3970 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 115 L | 69 L |