2009 Ford F-350 vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2009 Ford F-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2009 Ford F-350. (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford F-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 769 kg more than 2009 Ford F-350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford F-350. (495 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford F-350. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford F-350 has manual transmission. 2009 Ford F-350 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford F-350 2005 Jaguar XJ
Make Ford Jaguar
Model F-350 XJ
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5400 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 390 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 495 Nm 525 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.3:1 9.1:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 966 kg 1735 kg
Vehicle Length 5770 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1940 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 3490 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 12.4 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 144 L 84 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]