2009 Ford F-450 vs. 1976 Renault 5
To start off, 2009 Ford F-450 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 5 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1976 Renault 5. (33 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1976 Renault 5.
Because 2009 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 761 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Renault 5. (53 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Renault 5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-450 | 1976 Renault 5 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | F-450 | 5 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6400 cc | 782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2410 mm |
