2009 Ford F-450 vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2009 Ford F-450 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Because 2009 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 693 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-450 | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
| Make | Ford | Mercury |
| Model | F-450 | Lynx |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6400 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 121 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 144 L | 43 L |
