2009 Ford F-450 vs. 1985 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2009 Ford F-450 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-450 (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. (97 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-450 should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle.
Because 2009 Ford F-450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford F-450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Caravelle, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-450 (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 633 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle. (181 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Ford F-450 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-450 | 1985 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Ford | Plymouth |
Model | F-450 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2009 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6400 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 814 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2630 mm |