2009 Ford F-450 vs. 2001 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 2009 Ford F-450 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (390 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Ford F-450. (326 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford F-450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jaguar XJ220 (1,077 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford F-450. (814 Nm). This means 2001 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford F-450.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford F-450 | 2001 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | F-450 | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6400 cc | 3492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 326 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 814 Nm | 1077 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 2230 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2720 mm |
