2009 Ford F-450 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2009 Ford F-450 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford F-450. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 2009 Ford F-450 has manual transmission. 2009 Ford F-450 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford F-450 | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | F-450 | Dingo |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6400 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6670 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2430 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2030 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4390 mm | 2450 mm |