2009 Ford Fiesta vs. 1993 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2009 Ford Fiesta is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Nissan Cima weights approximately 560 kg more than 2009 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1993 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1993 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Fiesta | 1993 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Fiesta | Cima |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |