2009 Ford Flex vs. 1951 Morris Minor
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Morris Minor would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 229 more horse power than 1951 Morris Minor. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1951 Morris Minor.
Because 1951 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Morris Minor. (53 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Flex | 1951 Morris Minor | |
| Make | Ford | Morris |
| Model | Flex | Minor |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 918 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 27 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1560 mm |
