2009 Ford Flex vs. 1955 Studebaker Champion
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Studebaker Champion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Studebaker Champion would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1955 Studebaker Champion. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1955 Studebaker Champion. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Studebaker Champion weights approximately 409 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 1955 Studebaker Champion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Studebaker Champion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Flex | 1955 Studebaker Champion | |
| Make | Ford | Studebaker |
| Model | Flex | Champion |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3032 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 262 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2970 mm |
