2009 Ford Flex vs. 1956 Renault Juva
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Flex weights approximately 186 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 1956 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1956 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1956 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1956 Renault Juva | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Flex | Juva |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3494 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2360 mm |