2009 Ford Flex vs. 1963 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Renault 4 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 223 more horse power than 1963 Renault 4. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1963 Renault 4.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1963 Renault 4 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Flex | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 33 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1490 mm |