2009 Ford Flex vs. 1966 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1966 Toyota Crown. (98 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1966 Toyota Crown.
Because 1966 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Flex | 1966 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | Flex | Crown |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2599 cc |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 98 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1850 mm |
