2009 Ford Flex vs. 1967 Holden HR
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Holden HR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Holden HR would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1967 Holden HR. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1967 Holden HR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Holden HR weights approximately 324 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 2009 Ford Flex is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Holden HR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Holden HR. (245 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Holden HR.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1967 Holden HR | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Flex | HR |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 3048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2700 mm |