2009 Ford Flex vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. (197 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 174 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 2009 Ford Flex is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Flex | Tiger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Body Type | Crossover | Roadster |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4738 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 27 L |