2009 Ford Flex vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar E Type weights approximately 434 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 2009 Ford Flex is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Jaguar E Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Flex | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Flex | E Type |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 262 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 63 L |
