2009 Ford Flex vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1972 Datsun 240Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Datsun 240Z weights approximately 102 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 2009 Ford Flex is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Datsun 240Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Ford | Datsun |
Model | Flex | 240Z |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 11 L/100km |