2009 Ford Flex vs. 1974 Mazda 1000

To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 207 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 1000. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 1000.

Because 1974 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 1000. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1974 Mazda 1000 has manual transmission. 1974 Mazda 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: