2009 Ford Flex vs. 1974 Mazda 616
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1974 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Flex weights approximately 54 kg more than 1974 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1974 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Flex | 616 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 336 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2480 mm |