2009 Ford Flex vs. 1975 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1975 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1975 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1975 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Flex | 240 C |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1700 mm |