2009 Ford Flex vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma

To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (89 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. (176 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma has manual transmission. 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Ford Flex 1996 Mitsubishi Carisma
Make Ford Mitsubishi
Model Flex Carisma
Year Released 2009 1996
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3496 cc 1870 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 262 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 4250 RPM
Torque 336 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 2250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Vehicle Length 5130 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1410 mm