2009 Ford Flex vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (262 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2009 Ford Flex is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (336 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Flex | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Flex | FTO |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3496 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 262 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 336 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1300 mm |