2009 Ford Flex vs. 1996 Volvo 960

To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Flex (256 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 960. (168 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 960.

Because 1996 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Flex (245 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 960. (233 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Flex will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 960. 2009 Ford Flex has automatic transmission and 1996 Volvo 960 has manual transmission. 1996 Volvo 960 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Flex will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: