2009 Ford Flex vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2009 Ford Flex. (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Flex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 834 kg more than 2009 Ford Flex. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Flex is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford Flex | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Flex | F-Type |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3496 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 262 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2390 mm |
